In chapter 6 of Epstein's reading, the overall topic that is being is taught are compund claims. Epstein teachs us the definition, the function, and ways to apply these claims in our arguments. According to the reading, a compound claim is known as an alternate; two combined claims with the words 'or' and 'and' which then transforms into a single claim. To put this definition in simplier terms, 'two becomes one'. When comparing this term to grammar, it is practically the same concept as compound sentences, even when using the same words to conjoin the two ideas. An example of two claims becoming a compound claim:
-I will treat you out to dinner.
-I will take you to the movies.
When these claims are combined using the word 'and', the compound claim is stating that the person will receive both dinner and a night to the movies. When these claims are combined using the word 'or', the compound claim is stating that the person will receive on or the other and not both. These keywords determine the conclusion of the claims so one must be cautious in using the correct word.
Although the book has only told us about using the word "or" as a way of creating a compound, I never knew the word "and" also has the ability to create compound claims as well. The word "and" does fit the criteria of making compound claims because using the two alternatives would definitely make one claim. I made a post in my blog that is about compound claims by using the word "or", but if I were to include the word "and" I bet my statement would sound much more clearer. Instead of saying:
ReplyDeleteSome basketballs may be orange or they may be brown as well.
It'd be better if I were to say:
Basketballs are made in orange colors and brown colors.